Extending signalling pathways with protein-interaction networks. Application to apoptosis.

Experimental expansion network

(Orthology filter at JEV = 1e-20)

Here we present numerical results for Experimental expansion network in which interactions with JEV > 1e-20 were removed. In the following sections we provide the numerals we used to compute the p-Value for our predictions. For the computation of p-Value we consider as candidates the set of nodes in the network with sensitivity higher than 95% and PPV above 90% in the 5-fold cross-validation assay. For each validation set we compute a p-Value describing the likelyhood of obtaining the subset of validated candidates from the total number of proteins in the network according to the sizes of the candidates set and the validation set. Thus, a different p-Value is obtained for each validation set (Keyword, ProMiner).The mean JEV of the candidates and a p-Value for the significance of the differences between the JEV distribution of the candidates and the rest of the nodes in the network is provided as well.

• Individual scoring methods
• Cumulative combinations
• All Vs all combinations

Individual scoring methods

Validation of candidates posed by each scoring method. First column shows the analyzed scoring method. Second column corresponds to the number of nodes that accomplished quality criteria in the requested scoring methods. Columns 3 to 5 show relevant parameters for Keyword validation: the number of validated candidates, the size of the validation set and the p-Value obtained. Columns 6 to 8 contain analogous information for ProMiner validation.

Scoring method	Number of candidates	Keyword validated candidates	Keyword validation size	Keyword validation p-Value	ProMiner validated candidates	ProMiner validation size	ProMiner validation p-Value	JEV mean	JEV differences p-Value
FF	857	121	523	6.759859e-61	54	273	2.662740e-24	9.561285e-23	1.764957e-17
iALD	646	113	523	4.934961e-67	42	273	9.143783e-20	8.210885e-23	2.813184e-21
ALD	1012	81	523	3.504327e-24	43	273	1.186815e-13	7.959766e-23	< 1.000000e-323

The relevance of sequence similarity between interologs is analyzed in orthology expanded networks by removing those predictions that do not achieve a certain JEV value. Tables corresponding to the orthology filtered versions of this network are available for several -log(JEV) filter thresholds.
To access the tables, follow links below:

none

2

5

10

15

20

Go to top of page

Cumulative combinations

Validation of candidates posed by all possible combinations of N scoring methods, where N is shown in the first column. Second column corresponds to the number of nodes that accomplished quality criteria in the requested scoring methods. Columns 3 to 5 show relevant parameters for Keyword validation: the number of validated candidates, the size of the validation set and the p-Value obtained. Columns 6 to 8 contain analogous information for ProMiner validation.

Number of scoring method	Number of candidates	Keyword validated candidates	Keyword validation size	Keyword validation p-Value	ProMiner validated candidates	ProMiner validation size	ProMiner validation p-Value	JEV mean	JEV differences p-Value
3	87	23	523	7.384971e-50	7	273	7.298918e-16	1.360018e-43	2.714807e-74
2	430	91	523	1.825111e-128	39	273	5.751502e-55	4.167444e-24	< 1.000000e-323
1	1371	120	523	1.089499e-106	61	273	1.324580e-54	3.807247e-23	< 1.000000e-323

The relevance of sequence similarity between interologs is analyzed in orthology expanded networks by removing those predictions that do not achieve a certain JEV value. Tables corresponding to the orthology filtered versions of this network are available for several -log(JEV) filter thresholds.
To access the tables, follow links below:

none

2

5

10

15

20

Go to top of page

All Vs all combinations

Validation of candidates posed by each combination of scoring methods. Columns contain relevant parameters for the computation of the p-Value. For each validation method these are: number of candidates posed by the combination of scoring mehtods, number of validated candidates and the p-Value itself. The relevant fields of each validation method are colored in green if the row corresponds to the best combination of scoring methods for the validation method. For best combination of scoring methods rows, links lead to the details of validated protein candidates (under validated candidates columns) or to the details of new protein candidates (under combination of scoring methods column). Signalling-related functions of candidates from best combinations of scoring methods are given in Supplementary table 2.

Combination of scoring methods	Number of candidates	Keyword validated candidates	Keyword validation size	Keyword validation p-Value	ProMiner validated candidates	ProMiner validation size	ProMiner validation p-Value	JEV mean	JEV differences p-Value
ALD, FF	185	29	523	3.056948e-52	13	273	5.215429e-24	9.669484e-24	3.294679e-148
ALD, iALD	126	27	523	1.347353e-53	10	273	1.784042e-20	2.497122e-26	1.335980e-97
FF, iALD	293	81	523	3.232474e-129	30	273	1.125106e-47	4.038281e-44	5.948422e-247
ALD, FF, iALD	87	23	523	7.384971e-50	7	273	7.298918e-16	1.360018e-43	2.714807e-74

The relevance of sequence similarity between interologs is analyzed in orthology expanded networks by removing those predictions that do not achieve a certain JEV value. Tables corresponding to the orthology filtered versions of this network are available for several -log(JEV) filter thresholds.
To access the tables, follow links below:

none

2

5

10

15

20

Go to top of page